The Corrupt’s Ascendance in Power: A Bureaucrat’s Revelations

Badiur Rahman, a former secretary of the Bangladesh Government and ex-chairman of the National Board of Revenue, has emerged from his retirement as a voice exposing the deep-seated corruption within the bureaucratic machinery. His latest book, Domurua Theke Shachibaloy O Sorkari Chakrite Amar Onubhuti Shomogro (From Domurua to the Secretariat and My Feelings in Government Service), unveils the intricate webs of deceit and manipulation within the corridors of power. In a recent interview with a local newspaper, Rahman sheds light on the scandals involving recently ousted NBR member Matiur Rahman and first secretary Abu Mahmud Faisal, offering unprecedented insights into bureaucratic machinations.

Interview Excerpts:

Question: There has been significant talk about corruption in government administration lately. Is this a recent phenomenon or has it always been prevalent? What are your thoughts based on your extensive experience?

Answer: Corruption in administration isn't a newfound issue. It has persisted for decades. While scandals occasionally stir public outcry, they often fade away without substantial reforms. Unlike in the past, corrupt individuals now wield significant political and social influence, evading accountability and even gaining respect through their ill-gotten wealth and power.

Regarding the recent scandal involving NBR's Matiur Rahman, even his first wife Laila Kaneez, an elected upazila chairman, has been implicated. Despite this, there has been minimal scrutiny or consequences. This lack of accountability is deeply troubling.

Question: How was corruption tackled during your tenure in government?

Answer: In the past, there were mechanisms to combat corruption. I recall advising a businessman who faced extortion from a joint secretary. With evidence in hand, we exposed the corruption, leading to swift action and even an apology. Sadly, such decisive actions are rare today.

Question: Your book highlights four exemplary secretaries. What set them apart?

Answer: Secretaries like Keramat Ali, Syed Shameem Ahsan, Mohammad Ali, and Akbar Ali Khan stood out for their integrity and courage. They upheld justice, challenged injustice, and enforced rules impartially, despite political pressures. Today, such steadfastness is increasingly rare.

Question: How did political pressures influence your work under different governments?

Answer: During Ziaur Rahman's rule, transfers and promotions were based on merit, not political favoritism. Ershad's era saw some personal lobbying but maintained administrative integrity. However, subsequent governments, including BNP and Awami League, increasingly politicized the bureaucracy, compromising its effectiveness.

Question: What changes have you observed in public administration post-1990s movements?

Answer: The post-1990s era witnessed heightened politicization and patronage appointments, diminishing meritocracy. Both BNP and Awami League regimes favored loyalists, perpetuating corruption and nepotism.

Question: Your career was marked by challenges and setbacks, especially under BNP rule. Could you elaborate?

Answer: I faced unjust demotions and transfers under BNP, highlighting how integrity could be punished in favor of political allegiance. Such experiences underscored the declining standards in public service.

Question: Reflecting on your tenure as NBR chairman, what were the key challenges?

Answer: My tenure at NBR revealed systemic flaws and undue political influence, exemplified by attempts to protect corrupt officials like Matiur Rahman. Despite challenges, I upheld transparency and faced pressure with resilience.

Question: How do you assess the current state of administration compared to your time?

Answer: Today, corruption has institutionalized, with little regard for public shame or consequences. Political rhetoric against corruption often contradicts actions, fostering a culture of impunity. This erosion of ethical governance is deeply concerning for Bangladesh's future.